Intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome comparison among normal, poor and hyper responder females following controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors

  • Muhjah Falah The High Institute for Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-8280
  • Wasan A. Abdulhameed The High Institute for Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28969/IJEIR.v10.i2.r4.20

Keywords:

sponse, Normal response, ICSI.

Abstract

The aim of any given ICSI cycle is to achieve normal response and avoid poor
or hyper response. A part from ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS),
pregnancy rate in hyper responder females usually low which could be related
to the adverse effect of hyper estrogenic state on oocytes, embryos quality and
uterine endometrium. To evaluate the effect of hyper response on ICSI
outcome represented by oocytes, embryos quality, fertilization and pregnancy
rates. Study showed that total number of retrieved oocytes, mature, immature
oocytes, total embryos, good quality embryos and blastocyst count were
significantly higher in hyper followed by normal and poor responders
respectively. Fertilization rate was significantly higher in both hyper and
normal responders than poor ones, while pregnancy rate was significantly
higher in hyper responders 47.6% followed by normal 40.7% and then poor
ones 16.7%. Conclusions: Irrespective of abnormal hormonal milieu,
excessive ovarian response and higher number of produced oocytes improve
ICSI outcome in hyper responder females by increasing the chance of getting
higher number of embryos, good quality embryos and even blastocyst
numbers which in turn increase the chance of pregnancy

References

- Souter I, Sun F, Zhang H, Diamond MP, Legro RS, Wild RA, Hansen KR, Santoro N. A personalized medicine approach to ovulation induction/ovarian stimulation: development of a predictive model and online calculator from level-I evidence. Fertility and Sterility. 2022 Feb 1;117(2):408-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.10.024.

- Kumari RK, Agung A, Hendarto H, Dwiningsih SR. The Relationship of Antral Follicle Count (AFC) with Levels of Estradiol Serum and Mature Ovarian Follicles in Women Undergoing the IVF Program at the Graha Amerta Fertility Clinic of General Hospital of Dr. Soetomo in the Period 2018. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2021 Jul 1;15(3).

- Fischer-Holzhausen S, Röblitz S. Mathematical modelling of follicular growth and ovarian stimulation. Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research. 2022 Aug 6:100385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100385.

- Shin J, Kwon H, Choi DH, Park C, Kim JH, Kim J, Kang YJ, Koo HS. Accumulated Vitrified Embryos Could Be a Method for Increasing Pregnancy Rates in Patients with Poor Ovarian Response. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022 Aug 23;11(17):4940. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174940.

- Li NJ, Yao QY, Yuan XQ, Huang Y, Li YF. Anti–müllerian hormone as a predictor for live birth among women undergoing IVF/ICSI in different age groups: an update of systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2023 Jul;308(1):43-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06683-1.

- Razafintsalama-Bourdet M, Bah M, Amand G, Vienet-Lègue L, Pietin-Vialle C, Bry-Gauillard H, Pinto M, Pasquier M, Vernet T, Jung C, Levaillant JM. Random antral follicle count performed on any day of the menstrual cycle has the same predictive value as AMH for good ovarian response in IVF cycles. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2022 Jan 1;51(1):102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102233.

- Ho CY, Chang YY, Lin YH, Chen MJ. Prior salpingectomy impairs the retrieved oocyte number in in vitro fertilization cycles of women under 35 years old without optimal ovarian reserve. Plos one. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0268021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268021.

- Datta AK, Maheshwari A, Felix N, Campbell S, Nargund G. Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction update. 2021 Mar 1;27(2):229-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa035.

- Polat M, Mumusoglu S, Yarali Ozbek I, Bozdag G, Yarali H. Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?. Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health. 2021 Jun;15:26334941211024172. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334941211024172.

- Palomba S, Costanzi F, Nelson SM, Caserta D, Humaidan P. Interventions to prevent or reduce the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic umbrella review of the best clinical evidence. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2023 Jul 21;21(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01113-6.

- Braga DP, Zanetti BF, Setti AS, Iaconelli Jr A, Borges Jr E. Immature oocyte incidence: Contributing factors and effects on mature sibling oocytes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2020 Jan;24(1):70. https://doi.org/10.5935%2F1518-0557.20190056.

- Meng Y, Tao L, Xia T, Zhu J, Lin X, Zhou W, Liu Y, Ou J, Xing W. Elevated estradiol levels on hCG trigger day adversely effects on the clinical pregnancy rates of blastocyst embryo transfer but not cleavage-stage embryo transfer in fresh cycles: a retrospective cohort study. PeerJ. 2023 Jul 18;11:e15709. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15709.

- Huang J, Lu Y, He Y, Wang Y, Zhu Q, Qi J, Ding Y, Zhao H, Ding Z, Sun Y. The effect of peak serum estradiol level during ovarian stimulation on cumulative live birth and obstetric outcomes in freeze-all cycles. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffendo.2023.1130211.

- Pierson HE, Invik J, Meriano J, Pierson RA. A novel system for rapid conversion of Gardner embryo grades to linear scale numeric variables. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2023 May 1;46(5):808-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.01.008.

- Knez J, Kovačič B, Medved M, Vlaisavljević V. What is the value of anti-Müllerian hormone in predicting the response to ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols?. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2015 Dec;13:1-7. doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0049-5.

- Yadav V, Malhotra N, Mahey R, Singh N, Kriplani A. Ovarian sensitivity index (OSI): validating the use of a marker for ovarian responsiveness in IVF. Journal of reproduction & infertility. 2019 Apr;20(2):83 PMID: 31058052; PMCID: PMC6486569.

- Kamel A. Using Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Serum Estradiol to Predict Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Using Antagonist Protocol During IVF/ICSI Cycles. Evidence Based Women's Health Journal. 2017;7 (2):63-68.

- Hassan MF, Al-Yasiry RZ, Ghaleb RA. Possible predisposing and predictable factors for the development of ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) whom undergone intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Malaysian Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2020:1:37-40.

- Tsakos E, Tolikas A, Angelos Daniilidis, Asimakopoulos B. Predictive value of anti-mu¨llerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014. Springer.

- Vembu R, Reddy NS. Serum AMH level to predict the hyper response in women with PCOS and non-PCOS undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation in ART. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2017 Apr;10(2):91. PMID: 28904496; PMCID: PMC5586096.

- Di Paola R, Garzon S, Giuliani S, Laganà AS, Noventa M, Parissone F, Zorzi C, Raffaelli R, Ghezzi F, Franchi M, Zaffagnini S. Are we choosing the correct FSH starting dose during controlled ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination cycles? Potential application of a nomogram based on woman’s age and markers of ovarian reserve. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2018 Nov;298:1029-35. doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4906-2.

- Esinler I, Bozdag G, Yarali H. Impact of isolated obesity on ICSI outcome. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2008 Jan 1;17(4):583-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60249-0.

- Cakiroglu Y, Doger E, Vural F, Kopuk SY, Vural B. Impact of insulin resistance and obesity on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in young women with polycystıc ovary syndrome. North Clin Istanb. 2017 Oct 20;4(3):218-24. doi: 10.14744/nci.2017.79663.

- Amin AH, Sherif N, Askalani A, SaadAlla S. Comparative Study Between Ovarian Response Prediction Index Versus Anti-Müllerian Hormone, Antral Follicular Count as Predictors of Ovarian Response in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles. Evidence Based Women's Health Journal. 2021 May 1;11(2):146-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17205.1020.

- Satwik R, Kochhar M, Gupta SM, Majumdar A. Anti-mullerian hormone cut-off values for predicting poor ovarian response to exogenous ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2012 May;5(2):206 https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0974-1208.101023.

- Chang J, Xu L, Qin Y, Liu R, Li C, Gao S, Dang Y. Low anti-mullerian hormone decreased clinical pregnancy and increased risk of poor ovarian response in women over 35 years of age. Chinese Medical Journal. 2023 Feb 20;136(04):499-501.

- Fouks Y, Neuhausser W, Ryley D, Penzias A, Sakkas D, Vaughan D. ART outcomes in lean compared to obese phenotypes of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2023 May 22:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02804-0.

- Sudhakaran G, Babu SR, Mahendra H, Arockiaraj J. Updated experimental cellular models to study polycystic ovarian syndrome. Life Sciences. 2023 Apr 5:121672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121672.

- Sandeep K, Sangisapu S. Comparative study of ovarian reserve tests and ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine Healthc. 2019;6(1):1-8.

- Hu L, Sun B, Ma Y, Li L, Wang F, Shi H, Sun Y. The relationship between serum delta FSH level and ovarian response in IVF/ICSI cycles. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020 Nov 5;11:536100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.536100.

- Laqqan MM, Yassin MM. Investigation of the Predictive Factors of Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Women Aged Less Than 40 Years and Undergoing ICSI Cycle. Reproductive Sciences. 2023 Mar;30(3):873-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01055-1.

- Zhang D, Yuan X, Zhen J, Sun Z, Deng C, Yu Q. Mildly higher serum prolactin levels are directly proportional to cumulative pregnancy outcomes in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020 Aug 28;11:584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00584.

- Hassan MF. THE FREQUENCY OF ELEVATED PROLACTIN LEVEL IN POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME WOMEN (PCOS) AND ITS'EFFECT ON PREGNANCY RATE. Global Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2020 Mar 1;2(1):109-17. https://doi.org/10.37557/gjphm.v2i1.28.

- Barrenetxea G, Martínez E, De las Heras M, Arambarri JI, Axpe M, Barrenetxea J. Lack of predictive value of ovarian reserve tests for pregnancy likelihood. The huge difference between quantity and quality. Am J Biomed Sci & Res. 2019:133-41.doi: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.03.000649.

- Udumudi A, Lava KC, Hegde, V. High-Risk genotypes associated with poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation in Indian women. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2023;16(1):70.

- Abbasi F, Davar R, Shamsi F, Dashti S. Insulin-like growth factor-1 on cycle day 2 and assisted reproductive techniques outcome: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine. 2023 Feb;21(2):139. https://doi.org/10.18502%2Fijrm.v21i2.12804.

- Sasaki H, Hamatani T, Kamijo S, Iwai M, Kobanawa M, Ogawa S, Miyado K, Tanaka M. Impact of oxidative stress on age-associated decline in oocyte developmental competence. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019 Nov 22;10:811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00811.

- Kok JD, Looman CW, Weima SM, te Velde ER. A high number of oocytes obtained after ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not associated with decreased pregnancy outcome. Fertility and sterility. 2006 Apr 1;85(4):918-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.035.

- Astbury P, Subramanian GN, Greaney J, Roling C, Irving J, Homer HA. The Presence of Immature GV− Stage Oocytes during IVF/ICSI Is a Marker of Poor Oocyte Quality: A Pilot Study. Medical Sciences. 2020 Jan 16;8(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci8010004.

- Zhang F, Zhang H, Du H, Li X, Jin H, Li G. Application value of Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol in patients with resistant ovary syndrome. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023 Dec;23(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05477-w.

- Ertzeid G, Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Human reproduction. 2001 Feb 1;16(2):221-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.221.

- Alyasin A, Mehdinejadiani S, Ghasemi M. GnRH agonist trigger versus hCG trigger in GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI cycles: A review article. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 2016 Sep;14(9):557. PMID: 27738657; PMCID: PMC5054292.

- Liu S, Guo Y, Li F, Jin L. Influence of ovarian reserves on assisted reproductive and perinatal outcomes in patients with endometriosis: a retrospective study. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023 May 12;14:1084927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1084927.

- Mee L, Aw TC, Hum SC, Lee SN, Chung SF, Yu SL. Basal serum anti-müllerian hormone and antral follicle count are predictors of ovarian response for Asian women in Singapore. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 2014 Sep 1;3(3):169-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2305-0500(14)60021-X.

- Wu R, Chen Z, Xu W, Yang C, Zhou H, Xu W, Huang G, Zhao S. Impact of having surplus blastocysts cryopreserved on the ongoing pregnancy rate following a fresh transfer. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2023 May 26;39(1):2217281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2023.2217281.

- Adebayo FO, Ameh N, Adesiyun AG, Ekele BA, Wada I. Correlation of female age with outcome of IVF in a low‐resource setting. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2023 Apr;161(1):283-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14545.

- Huber M, Hadziosmanovic N, Berglund L, Holte J. Using the ovarian sensitivity index to define poor, normal, and high response after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol: suggestions for a new principle to solve an old problem. Fertility and sterility. 2013 Nov 1;100(5):1270-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.049.

- Bansiwal R, Mahey R, Malhotra N, Singh N, Saini M, Bhatt A, Nilima N, Mani K, Cheluvaraju R, Rajput M, Bhatla N. Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rate (CLBR) According to Patient Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) Stratification Among Low Prognosis Women Undergoing IVF-ICSI Cycles. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2023 Apr 18;24(2):117-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jri.v24i2.12497.

- Xu X, Yang A, Han Y, Wang W, Hao G, Cui N. Determining the Association between Serum Estradiol Levels on hCG Trigger Day and Live Birth Rates in Non-PCOS Patients. Research Developments in Medicine and Medical Science Vol. 8. 2023 Apr 10:13-44. 10.9734/bpi/rdmms/v8/18901D.

Published

2020-08-08

How to Cite

1.
Falah M, A. Abdulhameed W. Intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome comparison among normal, poor and hyper responder females following controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocol. IJEIR [Internet]. 2020 Aug. 8 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];10(2):51-74. Available from: https://ijeir.net/index.php/ijeir/article/view/142

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories